CONSTITUTION · BUDGET · ACCOUNTABILITY

Defining a culpable waste offence with legal precision

The harsher the principle, the more precise the elements of the offence must be.

Defining a culpable waste offence with legal precision
Defining a culpable waste offence with legal precision
Document status : Citizen working prototype requiring expert review: these drafts are not opinions of the Conseil d’État, the Constitutional Council or any public institution.

Why “bad management” is too vague

The legality principle requires a criminal offence to be defined in advance with sufficient precision. “Managing badly” or “wasting money” is not a safe criminal definition.

Proposed core

The working offence targets knowing falsification of mandatory fiscal data, deliberate concealment of information required for certification, destruction or alteration of mandatory records, and intentional circumvention of a final constitutional budget ruling.

Working penalties

The prototype studies imprisonment, fines, disqualification from office and confiscation within general legal safeguards. Penalty levels remain subject to expert review.

Express exclusions

Good-faith forecast errors, lawful policy choices, parliamentary votes, unforeseeable crises and reasonable decisions based on information available at the time are excluded.

Working documents and data

Legal and institutional sources

French Constitution, Article 34

Article 26

Article 47

Article 47-2

Article 61

Articles 67 and 68

Article 68-1

Article 89

French fiscal council — official missions

Organic Budget Act, Article 61

Financial Courts Code, L.131-2

Criminal Code, Article 131-21

Swiss debt brake

German Basic Law, Articles 109 and 115