Measure 4.04 · verifiable references

Legal File 4.04: AI-Assisted Case-Law Research

A search engine may suggest a lead; only a legal professional can verify the authority of the decision.

Legal File 4.04: AI-Assisted Case-Law Research
Legal File 4.04: AI-Assisted Case-Law Research
Primary risk

A convincing but false citation

An AI-assisted search tool may save time, but it may also invent a citation, merge two judgments, overlook a reversal or present an obsolete authority as current law.

The basic rule is therefore simple: no proposed citation may be relied upon until the original judgment has been located, opened and checked by a competent legal professional.

The evidence chain

  1. Query. Retain the wording, filters, date and user context.
  2. Candidate result. Record the system version and ranked references returned.
  3. Original source. Open the judgment in an authorised, authoritative repository.
  4. Legal reading. Check the facts, issue, reasoning, operative part and subsequent history.
  5. Use in the case. The professional decides whether the authority is relevant and explains its role.
  6. Audit trace. Preserve enough evidence to reconstruct the research process.

Minimum technical and contractual requirements

Authorised corpora

Identify the repositories searched and the rules governing access and reuse.

Currentness

State the last update date and detect repealed, reversed or superseded authorities.

Stable identifiers

Return a persistent reference that enables the original judgment to be found.

Honest uncertainty

The system must be able to say that no reliable result has been found.

Version history

Retain model, index and configuration versions used for the search.

Audit access

Permit an authorised reviewer to examine queries, results and source links.

Useful indicators

IndicatorWhat it reveals
Unfindable-reference rateThe share of suggested authorities that cannot be traced to an original source.
Outdated-authority rateThe share of results no longer representing current law.
Relevant-result precisionHow many returned references are genuinely useful for the question asked.
Human rejection rateHow often professionals discard the system’s suggestions.
Time to verificationWhether the tool saves time after mandatory human checking.
Design principle. A research assistant may point toward a judgment. It must never manufacture legal authority or conceal the limits of its search.

Main official sources

  1. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act.
  2. CNIL — AI impact assessment.