Justice package · traceable costing

Costing the Justice Package Without Inventing False Savings

A reform may greatly improve service without immediately reducing the budget. The table must show that rather than hide it.

Costing the Justice Package Without Inventing False Savings
Costing the Justice Package Without Inventing False Savings

Four concepts that must remain separate

Initial investment

Training, buildings, integration and testing before operation.

Recurring cost

Annual staff, maintenance, hosting, audit and support.

Capacity gain

More cases processed or backlog reduced without an automatic budget cut.

Net saving

Demonstrated expenditure avoided after new recurring costs.

Core formulas

Total transition cost = initial investment + temporary parallel-operation costs
Net budget saving = demonstrated avoided expenditure − new recurring costs

Why “to be assessed” is a serious answer

Do not invent a price to fill a table. Where licence volumes, property costs, training or maintenance are not established, the matrix deliberately keeps “to be assessed”.

Downloads